June 4, 2025
MGA is asking for that the courtroom tumble the $71 million verdict or shed the damages, as they imagine that the decision used to be legally mistaken.
In January, T.I.’s $71 million judgment towards MGA Leisure used to be restored later $53 million in punitive damages have been stripped away. On the other hand, MGA has asked some other trial in an effort to opposite the judgment awarded to the Atlanta rapper and his spouse, Slight Harris.
In keeping with AllHipHop, the leisure corporate is trying to get a fourth trial in regards to the couple suing the corporate for stealing the likeness in their former lady workforce, OMG Girlz. MGA requests that the courtroom tumble the $71 million verdict or shed the damages, as they imagine it used to be legally mistaken.
They’re asking if the courtroom doesn’t believe their request, they obtain a pristine trial.
The corporate argues that the doll’s glance used to be no longer related to T.I. and Slight’s workforce, or even if that is so, the crowd had already unwanted it years previous. They declare that there’s deny proof of customers being at a loss for words between the dolls and the OMG Girlz. Including to their argument, MGA states that the couple has no longer confirmed that there used to be latest hurt or a misappropriation in their industry secrets and techniques. They cite the First Modification, announcing it protects their inventive accentuation in designing the dolls.
Within the untouched lawsuit, T.I. and Slight sued MGA Leisure for copying the likeness of the OMG Girlz workforce, which featured their daughter, Zonnique Pullins, and two alternative ladies. MGA made seven dolls that allegedly copied the woman workforce.
The jury ruled in partiality of T.I. and Slight, however U.S. District Pass judgement on James Selna after mentioned that there used to be no longer plethora proof to turn that MGA acted in a way that might legally warrant the punitive damages within the infringement case. Upcoming the courtroom briefly negated the $53.6 million, it poised a listening to for all sides to plead their case.
The listening to targeted on whether or not the jury’s verdicts have been advisory or if the award quantity can be left as much as Selna. The pass judgement on guarded the ruling later mentioning that all sides had yes to a jury verdict.
